CROSSCARRIERS.COM
And he (Jesus) said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me. (Luke 9:23)
george@crosscarriers.com
Title: Congregationalism vs. Elder Rule in Baptist Church Leadership:
A Scriptural and Historical Analysis (Personal Study / Research)
Introduction
Church leadership has always been a subject of theological and practical discussion within the Christian tradition. Among Baptist churches, the question of who holds final authority in local church matters—the congregation as a whole or a group of elders—has become more prominent in recent decades. Historically, Baptist churches have held to congregational polity, but a growing number of churches have adopted elder-led or elder-ruled models. This paper explores both systems, the scriptural basis for congregationalism, the historical timeline of change, and the perceived control that elders exercise in elder-ruled churches.
I. Definitions and Basic Models
Congregationalism is a form of church government where the final human authority resides in the assembled local body of believers. Every member typically has a voice and vote in key decisions such as selecting pastors, approving budgets, and calling or dismissing leaders.
Elder Rule, sometimes known as Presbyterian polity (though structured differently among Baptists), places governing authority primarily in a group of elders. In elder-led Baptist churches, the elders may lead while still involving the congregation in some decisions. In elder-ruled models, the congregation may have little say beyond affirming elder decisions.
II. Scriptural Basis for Congregationalism
A. The Priesthood of All Believers
1 Peter 2:9: "But you are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood..."
Baptists hold that each believer is competent under Christ and the Holy Spirit to understand and participate in church life.
B. Church Discipline as a Congregational Act
Matthew 18:15–17: Jesus instructs that if a matter of sin cannot be resolved, “tell it to the church.”
This implies the gathered assembly holds final authority in matters of discipline—not a group of elders.
C. Selection of Leaders Involves the Whole Church
Acts 6:3: “...choose seven men from among you...”
The apostles instructed the whole congregation to choose deacons, showing congregational involvement.
D. Church Decisions as Congregational Acts
Acts 15:22: “Then it seemed good to the apostles and the elders, with the whole church...”
Important decisions were made not only by leaders but with active participation by the congregation.
E. Autonomy of the Local Church
Revelation 2–3: Jesus addresses individual local churches directly, showing accountability at the local level, not through a higher ecclesiastical structure or ruling council.
III. Historical Shift Away from Elder Control in Baptist Life
A. Early Baptist Polity
Early English Baptists (1600s) affirmed congregational rule.
Confessions like the 1689 London Baptist Confession acknowledged elders, but final decisions were with the church body.
B. 18th–19th Century American Baptists
Baptist churches in America largely followed pure congregationalism with pastors, sometimes elders, as servants and guides, not rulers.
C. Mid-20th Century to Present
A resurgence of elder rule began in the 1980s–1990s, influenced by:
o Reformed theology (e.g., John Piper, Mark Dever)
o The desire for efficiency and doctrinal clarity
o Reaction to perceived disorder or immaturity in church votes
o Growth of megachurches, which made congregational voting impractical
IV. Reasons Churches Moved Toward Elder Rule
1. Efficiency in Decision-Making: Elders streamline processes.
2. Doctrinal Protection: Elders seen as theological gatekeepers.
3. Church Growth: Large congregations often can't function democratically.
4. Fear of Uninformed Voting: Leaders may feel members lack the knowledge to decide complex issues.
5. Influence of Reformed Leaders: Reformed ecclesiology (e.g., 9Marks, Acts 29) heavily promotes elder rule.
V. Perceived and Actual Control of Elders in Elder-Led Churches
Perceived Elder Powers Include:
Selecting pastors without congregational input
Dismissing staff or members without church-wide vote
Establishing doctrine, membership standards, and budget
Withholding or limiting congregational meetings
Blocking motions or initiatives by the congregation
Actual Controls Depend on the Model:
Elder-led congregationalism: Elders propose, congregation affirms.
Elder rule: Elders decide, congregation is informed (sometimes after the fact).
Some churches even change bylaws to remove congregational voting rights over time.
VI. Biblical Warnings and Wisdom
Scripture supports leadership, but it also warns against lording authority:
1 Peter 5:2–3: “...not lording it over those entrusted to you...”
Elders are shepherds, not rulers.
Matthew 23:8–10: “You are all brothers…”
Christ emphasized servant leadership, not hierarchy.
Galatians 1:8–9: Even leaders can go astray, so congregational accountability is vital.
VII. Conclusion: Why Congregationalism Should Be Preserved in Baptist Churches
While elder leadership can be biblical when properly balanced, Baptist churches should resist trends that remove authority from the body of believers. Scripture teaches that the local church, under the lordship of Christ and the guidance of Scripture, should make key decisions together.
Congregationalism guards against abuse, protects church unity, and affirms the New Testament model where the whole body has a voice. Elders should serve as shepherds, not governors, pointing people to Christ, not consolidating authority.
Works Referenced (Suggested):
The Deliberate Church, Mark Dever & Paul Alexander
Baptist Foundations, edited by Mark Dever & Jonathan Leeman
Polity: Biblical Arguments on How to Conduct Church Life, ed. by Mark Dever
1689 London Baptist Confession
Scripture citations throughout (Matt. 18, Acts 6, Acts 15, etc.)